The Inheritance of (Wicked) Speech: A Reconsideration of Job 20.29
In his commentary on Job, David Clines, while outlining different possibilities for understanding the unique use of אֵמֶר in Job 20.29, suggests that the word is out of place and that no convincing emendation has been proposed. This article explores this lexeme, showing that there are good reasons...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Sage
2021
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2021, 卷: 45, 發布: 3, Pages: 357-370 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Old Testament
/ Bible. Ijob 20
/ Bible. Ijob 27
/ Hebrew language
/ Exegesis
/ Linguistic analysis
/ Textual criticism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
second speech cycle of the book of Job
B Textual Criticism B Occupation B speech ethics B Hebrew Poetry B Lament B Parallelism B protest prayer B Job 20.29 B Job 20 |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |