Confirming Scripture through Eyewitness Testimony (2 Peter 1.19a): Resolving a Crux Interpretum
Responding to objections raised against the parousia, the author of 2 Peter seeks to defend the validity of Jesus’ return by pointing to the experience of the apostles at the Transfiguration (1.16-18) and to prophetic scripture (1.19-21). But how these two proofs relate to one another has been a mat...
| Другие заглавия: | Special Issue: Paul and the Praetorium, Guest Editors: Ryan S Schellenberg and Heidi Wendt |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage
2021
|
| В: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Год: 2021, Том: 43, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 605-624 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Очевидец
/ Преображение Христа (праздник) (Мотив)
/ Парусия
/ Bibel. Petrusbrief 2. 1,16-18
/ Bibel. Petrusbrief 2. 1,19-21
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | HC Новый Завет KAB Раннее христианство |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Responding to objections raised against the parousia, the author of 2 Peter seeks to defend the validity of Jesus’ return by pointing to the experience of the apostles at the Transfiguration (1.16-18) and to prophetic scripture (1.19-21). But how these two proofs relate to one another has been a matter of dispute since the earliest days of critical scholarship. Standing behind this disagreement is a difficult grammatical construction involving the comparative adjective βεβαιότερον (2 Pet. 1.19a). This article seeks to bring resolution to the debate through a comprehensive assessment of the force and function of this key term. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X211004451 |