The Succession Narrative in Twenty-first-century Research
Although research on the Succession Narrative has proliferated in recent decades, no comprehensive surveys of secondary literature have appeared since the mid-1990s. In this article, I survey the many disparate works of Succession Narrative scholarship that have been published since that time. I foc...
Опубликовано в: : | Currents in biblical research |
---|---|
Главный автор: | |
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Sage
2021
|
В: |
Currents in biblical research
|
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Преемство
/ Повесть (мотив)
/ Bibel. Samuel 2. 9-20
/ Bibel. Könige 1. 1-2
|
Индексация IxTheo: | HB Ветхий Завет |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
royal succession
B intention criticism B Leonhard Rost B Court History B 2 Samuel 9–20 B Succession Narrative B David B Solomon B 1 Kings 1–2 B Bathsheba B Adonijah B Source Criticism |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | Although research on the Succession Narrative has proliferated in recent decades, no comprehensive surveys of secondary literature have appeared since the mid-1990s. In this article, I survey the many disparate works of Succession Narrative scholarship that have been published since that time. I focus on recent conclusions about the boundaries, unity, date, intention, and theme of the traditionally delineated Succession Narrative (2 Samuel 9–20; 1 Kings 1–2). While the traditional theory of the text, as formulated by Leonhard Rost, dominated scholarship of the twentieth century, in the twenty-first, nothing approaching a consensus can be claimed for any aspect of the Succession Narrative. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5200 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Currents in biblical research
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1476993X20954841 |