The Succession Narrative in Twenty-first-century Research
Although research on the Succession Narrative has proliferated in recent decades, no comprehensive surveys of secondary literature have appeared since the mid-1990s. In this article, I survey the many disparate works of Succession Narrative scholarship that have been published since that time. I foc...
| 發表在: | Currents in biblical research |
|---|---|
| 主要作者: | |
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Sage
2021
|
| In: |
Currents in biblical research
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
繼任
/ 鈙事
/ Bibel. Samuel 2. 9-20
/ Bibel. Könige 1. 1-2
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
royal succession
B intention criticism B Leonhard Rost B Court History B 2 Samuel 9–20 B Succession Narrative B David B Solomon B 1 Kings 1–2 B Bathsheba B Adonijah B Source Criticism |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | Although research on the Succession Narrative has proliferated in recent decades, no comprehensive surveys of secondary literature have appeared since the mid-1990s. In this article, I survey the many disparate works of Succession Narrative scholarship that have been published since that time. I focus on recent conclusions about the boundaries, unity, date, intention, and theme of the traditionally delineated Succession Narrative (2 Samuel 9–20; 1 Kings 1–2). While the traditional theory of the text, as formulated by Leonhard Rost, dominated scholarship of the twentieth century, in the twenty-first, nothing approaching a consensus can be claimed for any aspect of the Succession Narrative. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5200 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Currents in biblical research
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1476993X20954841 |