Divine hiddenness and the problem of no greater goods

John Schellenberg argues that God would never withhold the possibility of conscious personal relationship with Him from anyone for the sake of greater goods, since there simply would not be greater goods than a conscious personal relationship with God. Given that nonresistant nonbelief withholds the...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Teeninga, Luke (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2021
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2021, 卷: 89, 發布: 2, Pages: 107-123
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B 神義論 / Höchstes Gut
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Theism
B Divine Hiddenness
B Atheism
B Problem of no greater goods
在線閱讀: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1760783196
003 DE-627
005 20210723094655.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210618s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-020-09767-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1760783196 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1760783196 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Teeninga, Luke  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Divine hiddenness and the problem of no greater goods 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a John Schellenberg argues that God would never withhold the possibility of conscious personal relationship with Him from anyone for the sake of greater goods, since there simply would not be greater goods than a conscious personal relationship with God. Given that nonresistant nonbelief withholds the possibility of such relationship, this entails that God would not allow nonresistant nonbelief for the sake of greater goods. Thus, if Schellenberg is right, all greater goods responses to the hiddenness argument must fail in principle. I argue that there are good reasons for thinking that greater goods responses do not, for the above reason, fail in principle. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Atheism 
650 4 |a Theism 
650 4 |a Problem of no greater goods 
650 4 |a Divine Hiddenness 
652 |a AB:NBC 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059740-4  |0 (DE-627)104589558  |0 (DE-576)209132027  |2 gnd  |a Theodizee 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4595674-1  |0 (DE-627)326086374  |0 (DE-576)214078744  |2 gnd  |a Höchstes Gut 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 89(2021), 2, Seite 107-123  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:89  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:107-123 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-020-09767-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 89  |j 2021  |e 2  |h 107-123 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3939346764 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1760783196 
LOK |0 005 20210723094655 
LOK |0 008 210618||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-06-17#77F417CC6755FD4569D8C991E490C2166A9E4EAC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Highest good,Theodicy,Theodicy 
STB 0 0 |a Summum bonum,Théodicée,Théodicée 
STC 0 0 |a Bien supremo,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STD 0 0 |a Sommo bene,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STE 0 0 |a 神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论 
STF 0 0 |a 神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論 
STG 0 0 |a Bem supremo,Teodiceia,Teodiceia 
STH 0 0 |a Высшее благо,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея 
STI 0 0 |a Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία,Υπέρτατο αγαθό 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Höchstes Gutes