Divine hiddenness and the problem of no greater goods
John Schellenberg argues that God would never withhold the possibility of conscious personal relationship with Him from anyone for the sake of greater goods, since there simply would not be greater goods than a conscious personal relationship with God. Given that nonresistant nonbelief withholds the...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2021
|
| В: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Год: 2021, Том: 89, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 107-123 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Теодицея (мотив)
/ Высшее благо
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии NBC Бог |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Theism
B Divine Hiddenness B Atheism B Problem of no greater goods |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | John Schellenberg argues that God would never withhold the possibility of conscious personal relationship with Him from anyone for the sake of greater goods, since there simply would not be greater goods than a conscious personal relationship with God. Given that nonresistant nonbelief withholds the possibility of such relationship, this entails that God would not allow nonresistant nonbelief for the sake of greater goods. Thus, if Schellenberg is right, all greater goods responses to the hiddenness argument must fail in principle. I argue that there are good reasons for thinking that greater goods responses do not, for the above reason, fail in principle. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8684 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11153-020-09767-7 |