Catholicism and the Natural Law: A Response to Four Misunderstandings
This article responds to four criticisms of the Catholic view of natural law: (1) it commits the naturalistic fallacy, (2) it makes divine revelation unnecessary, (3) it implausibly claims to establish a shared universal set of moral beliefs, and (4) it disregards the noetic effects of sin. Relying...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
MDPI
2021
|
| В: |
Religions
Год: 2021, Том: 12, Выпуск: 6 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Aquinas
B Catholicism B natural law theory B Naturalistic Fallacy |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1761754246 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210701171951.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210701s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel12060379 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1761754246 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1761754246 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)171784804 |0 (DE-627)06202857X |0 (DE-576)16610423X |4 aut |a Beckwith, Francis |d 1960- | |
| 109 | |a Beckwith, Francis 1960- |a Beckwith, Francis J. 1960- |a Beckwith, Francis Joseph 1960- |a Beckwith, Frank 1960- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Catholicism and the Natural Law |b A Response to Four Misunderstandings |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article responds to four criticisms of the Catholic view of natural law: (1) it commits the naturalistic fallacy, (2) it makes divine revelation unnecessary, (3) it implausibly claims to establish a shared universal set of moral beliefs, and (4) it disregards the noetic effects of sin. Relying largely on the Church’s most important theologian on the natural law, St. Thomas Aquinas, the author argues that each criticism rests on a misunderstanding of the Catholic view. To accomplish this end, the author first introduces the reader to the natural law by way of an illustration he calls the “the ten (bogus) rules.” He then presents Aquinas’ primary precepts of the natural law and shows how our rejection of the ten bogus rules ultimately relies on these precepts (and inferences from them). In the second half of the article, he responds directly to each of the four criticisms. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Aquinas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Catholicism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a natural law theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalistic Fallacy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 12(2021), 6, Artikel-ID 379 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g elocationid:379 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/6/379/pdf?version=1621993389 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060379 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/6/379 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 2021 |e 6 |i 379 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3942953374 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1761754246 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210701163352 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210701||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||