Response: Making Yourself Useful
In this essay I reply to Stanley Hauerwas' reading of my book, Life as We Know It, by way of engaging Hauerwas' critique of Enlightenment humanism, and, more specifically, the Kantian categorical imperative. I argue that Hauerwas is mistaken to claim that “humanism cannot help but think th...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Routledge
2005
|
| In: |
Journal of religion, disability & health
Year: 2005, 卷: 8, 發布: 3/4, Pages: 31-36 |
| Further subjects: | B
Disability
B Autonomy B Dependency B Humanism |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1765263379 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210802173510.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210802s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1300/J095v08n03_04 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1765263379 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1765263379 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)140974806 |0 (DE-627)703846361 |0 (DE-576)169432041 |4 aut |a Bérubé, Michael |d 1961- | |
| 109 | |a Bérubé, Michael 1961- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Response |b Making Yourself Useful |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this essay I reply to Stanley Hauerwas' reading of my book, Life as We Know It, by way of engaging Hauerwas' critique of Enlightenment humanism, and, more specifically, the Kantian categorical imperative. I argue that Hauerwas is mistaken to claim that “humanism cannot help but think that, all things considered, it would be better if [the mentally handicapped] did not exist,” even as I agree in part with his trenchant critique of my own work and of the widely-accepted Kantian proposition that human beings should treat each other as ends in themselves, never as means to an end. Finally, I defend my antifoundationalist formulation of moral “obligation” with regard to persons with mental disabilities against Hauerwas's Christian critique thereof by noting that even Hauerwas, at a critical juncture of his argument, relies on a pragmatist, antifoundationalist understanding of what it means to “help” other humans-and what it means to make oneself useful. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Disability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dependency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Humanism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religion, disability & health |d [S.l.] : Routledge, 1999 |g 8(2005), 3/4, Seite 31-36 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)366026801 |w (DE-600)2112749-9 |w (DE-576)105935026 |x 1522-9122 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2005 |g number:3/4 |g pages:31-36 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1300/J095v08n03_04 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 2005 |e 3/4 |h 31-36 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3959212798 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1765263379 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210802171845 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210802||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||