Sola gratia: der Streit um die Gnade im 16. Jahrhundert, seine Auswirkungen für die Neuzeit und seine Virulenz in der Gegenwart
The "Common declaration about the theology of justification" from 1999 contains a "differentiated consensus". To understand the differences one must have recourse to the catholic position based on the thinking of late Antiquity and the Middle Ages as well as the protestant positi...
Publié dans: | Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Allemand |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Echter
2004
|
Dans: |
Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Année: 2004, Volume: 126, Numéro: 3, Pages: 257-268 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Doctrine de la grâce
/ Théologie de controverse
/ Histoire 1500-1600
B Doctrine de la justification / Église catholique / Église protestante / Œcuménisme |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Molina,Luis
B Rédemption / Grâce B redemption / grace B Ecumenical Theology B Thomas Aquinas B Luther,Martin B Théologie œcuménique B Péché / Justification B sin / justification B Thomas von Aquin B Kant,Immanuel |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
Résumé: | The "Common declaration about the theology of justification" from 1999 contains a "differentiated consensus". To understand the differences one must have recourse to the catholic position based on the thinking of late Antiquity and the Middle Ages as well as the protestant position grounded in modern thinking. The article exemplifies this hypothesis with an analysis of the relationship between grace and freedom in the thought of Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, Luis de Molina, and Immanuel Kant. Ecumenical progress depends to a great extent on the ability to relate medieval and modern thought. |
---|---|
Contient: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|