Sola gratia: der Streit um die Gnade im 16. Jahrhundert, seine Auswirkungen für die Neuzeit und seine Virulenz in der Gegenwart

The "Common declaration about the theology of justification" from 1999 contains a "differentiated consensus". To understand the differences one must have recourse to the catholic position based on the thinking of late Antiquity and the Middle Ages as well as the protestant positi...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Auteur principal: Ruhstorfer, Karlheinz 1963- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Allemand
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Echter 2004
Dans: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Année: 2004, Volume: 126, Numéro: 3, Pages: 257-268
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Doctrine de la grâce / Théologie de controverse / Histoire 1500-1600
B Doctrine de la justification / Église catholique / Église protestante / Œcuménisme
Sujets non-standardisés:B Molina,Luis
B Rédemption / Grâce
B redemption / grace
B Ecumenical Theology
B Thomas Aquinas
B Luther,Martin
B Théologie œcuménique
B Péché / Justification
B sin / justification
B Thomas von Aquin
B Kant,Immanuel
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Non-électronique
Description
Résumé:The "Common declaration about the theology of justification" from 1999 contains a "differentiated consensus". To understand the differences one must have recourse to the catholic position based on the thinking of late Antiquity and the Middle Ages as well as the protestant position grounded in modern thinking. The article exemplifies this hypothesis with an analysis of the relationship between grace and freedom in the thought of Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, Luis de Molina, and Immanuel Kant. Ecumenical progress depends to a great extent on the ability to relate medieval and modern thought.
Contient:Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie