“To Struggle Against the Tree of Life”: Reading Bonhoeffer’s Creation and Fall in the Anthropocene
Bonhoeffer’s Creation and Fall guides readers through a “theological” exegesis of Genesis chapters 1–3 and was an early manifestation of the “German Church Struggle” (Kirchenkampf) against National Socialism. In this paper, I propose a re-reading of Creation and Fall attentive to contemporary enviro...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2021
|
| In: |
Political theology
Year: 2021, 卷: 22, 發布: 6, Pages: 493-509 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945, Schöpfung und Fall
/ Connolly, William E. 1938-
/ Anthropogene Klimaänderung
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NBE Anthropology NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Garden of Eden
B Serpent B Climate Change B William E. Connolly B Fascism B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B Tree of life |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | Bonhoeffer’s Creation and Fall guides readers through a “theological” exegesis of Genesis chapters 1–3 and was an early manifestation of the “German Church Struggle” (Kirchenkampf) against National Socialism. In this paper, I propose a re-reading of Creation and Fall attentive to contemporary environmental and political conditions. Drawing on the work of William E. Connolly, I outline points of affirmation, critique, and supplementation. Just as Bonhoeffer recognized the need for a “crisis theology” in the face of Nazism, so now global warming and the rise of “aspirational fascism” demands analogous efforts. I argue that Bonhoeffer’s focus on biblical myth as a counter to fascist myth, his articulation of a relational ontology and embrace of “incarnational humanism,” are all relevant to the task of Christian political theology today. There is a need, however, to transcend Bonhoeffer’s anthropocentric bias, supplementing his readings of Eden’s mythic symbols to encourage forms of “entangled humanism” that are essential to Creation’s defence. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2020.1840037 |