Consciousness and Moral Responsibility: Skeptical Challenges and Theological Reflections

Some philosophers and scientists have argued that we humans cannot be held morally responsible for anything. Invoking results of the neurosciences and the cognitive sciences, they argue that humans lack the kind of conscious control and awareness required for moral responsibility. For theological et...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Visala, Aku (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2021
In: Zygon
Year: 2021, Volume: 56, Issue: 3, Pages: 641-665
Further subjects:B Cognitive Science
B Free Will
B Neuroscience
B Consciousness
B Psychology
B Moral Responsibility
B Self
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1771798955
003 DE-627
005 20220519160254.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210925s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12694  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1771798955 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1771798955 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042589070  |0 (DE-627)769124275  |0 (DE-576)348128134  |4 aut  |a Visala, Aku 
109 |a Visala, Aku  |a Visala, Aku Olavi 
245 1 0 |a Consciousness and Moral Responsibility: Skeptical Challenges and Theological Reflections 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Some philosophers and scientists have argued that we humans cannot be held morally responsible for anything. Invoking results of the neurosciences and the cognitive sciences, they argue that humans lack the kind of conscious control and awareness required for moral responsibility. For theological ethics and Christian theology as a whole, moral responsibility is indispensable. I will begin by outlining some empirical results that are invoked in support of moral responsibility skepticism. I will, then, examine the subsequent discussion and the question why conscious awareness is central to moral responsibility. Consciousness contributes to morally relevant control over action in multiple ways. I will briefly examine some accounts of conscious control that are resistant to the skeptical challenge. Although the empirical results might lead us to revise the degree and range of conscious control, there seems to be enough of it to ground many everyday practices of responsibility. I will conclude the article with some theological reflections. 
601 |a Challenger 
601 |a Theologe 
650 4 |a Self 
650 4 |a Psychology 
650 4 |a Neuroscience 
650 4 |a Moral Responsibility 
650 4 |a Free Will 
650 4 |a Consciousness 
650 4 |a Cognitive Science 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 56(2021), 3, Seite 641-665  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:56  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:641-665 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12694  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12694  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 56  |j 2021  |e 3  |h 641-665 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3981348362 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1771798955 
LOK |0 005 20210925042658 
LOK |0 008 210925||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-09-24#A45A97BE72F6FC3263FC5E941E7E7DC47E565F4C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL