Reasoning from out of Particularity: Possibilities for Conversation in Theological Ethics
Frequently, theological particularity can hinder attempts at inter-religious conversations in theological ethics, as each tradition’s reasoning is inextricably bound up with core doctrinal elements not shared by other traditions. I argue, however, that elements of particularity can facilitate conver...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Sage
2012
|
| En: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Año: 2012, Volumen: 25, Número: 2, Páginas: 236-243 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Rabbinic
B Ethics B Dialogue B Reasoning B Judaism B Interfaith B Particularity |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electrónico
|
| Sumario: | Frequently, theological particularity can hinder attempts at inter-religious conversations in theological ethics, as each tradition’s reasoning is inextricably bound up with core doctrinal elements not shared by other traditions. I argue, however, that elements of particularity can facilitate conversation when emphasis is placed on movements of ethical reasoning between particular statements within each tradition. By examining the classical rabbinic practice of verbal forewarning in capital cases, I show that although the starting point and ending point of an instance of theological reasoning may be ‘exclusivistic’, the relationship between those points can serve as the basis for comparison and dialogue. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946811435389 |