Reasoning from out of Particularity: Possibilities for Conversation in Theological Ethics
Frequently, theological particularity can hinder attempts at inter-religious conversations in theological ethics, as each tradition’s reasoning is inextricably bound up with core doctrinal elements not shared by other traditions. I argue, however, that elements of particularity can facilitate conver...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Sage
2012
|
| Em: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Ano: 2012, Volume: 25, Número: 2, Páginas: 236-243 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Rabbinic
B Ethics B Dialogue B Reasoning B Judaism B Interfaith B Particularity |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Recurso Electrónico
|
| Resumo: | Frequently, theological particularity can hinder attempts at inter-religious conversations in theological ethics, as each tradition’s reasoning is inextricably bound up with core doctrinal elements not shared by other traditions. I argue, however, that elements of particularity can facilitate conversation when emphasis is placed on movements of ethical reasoning between particular statements within each tradition. By examining the classical rabbinic practice of verbal forewarning in capital cases, I show that although the starting point and ending point of an instance of theological reasoning may be ‘exclusivistic’, the relationship between those points can serve as the basis for comparison and dialogue. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946811435389 |