Intrinsic Goodness and Contingency, Resemblance and Particularity: Two Criticisms of Robert Adams’s Finite and Infinite Goods
Robert Adams’s Finite and Infinite Goods is one of the most important and innovative contributions to Christian ethics in recent memory. This article identifies two major flaws at the heart of Adams’s theory: his notion of intrinsic value and his claim that ‘excellence’ or finite goodness is constit...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2012
|
In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 418-441 |
Further subjects: | B
Resemblance
B Value Theory B Robert Adams B Platonism B Intrinsic Value B Godlikeness |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1776584880 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211110232623.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211110s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0953946812454789 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1776584880 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1776584880 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1041957629 |0 (DE-627)768041813 |0 (DE-576)393605116 |4 aut |a Decosimo, Joseph David |d 1979- | |
109 | |a Decosimo, Joseph David 1979- |a Decosimo, David 1979- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Intrinsic Goodness and Contingency, Resemblance and Particularity: Two Criticisms of Robert Adams’s Finite and Infinite Goods |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Robert Adams’s Finite and Infinite Goods is one of the most important and innovative contributions to Christian ethics in recent memory. This article identifies two major flaws at the heart of Adams’s theory: his notion of intrinsic value and his claim that ‘excellence’ or finite goodness is constituted by resemblance to God. I first elucidate Adams’s complex, frequently misunderstood claims concerning intrinsic value and Godlikeness. I then contend that Adams’s notion of intrinsic value cannot explain what it could mean for countless finite goods to be intrinsically valuable. Next, I articulate a criticism of his Godlikeness thesis altogether unlike those he has previously addressed: I show that, on Adams’s own account of Godlikeness, a diverse myriad of excellences could not possibly count as resembling God. His theory thus fails to account for a whole world of finite goods. I defend my two criticisms against objections and briefly sketch a more Aristotelian and Christian way forward. | ||
601 | |a Adams, Robert | ||
650 | 4 | |a Value Theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Resemblance | |
650 | 4 | |a Platonism | |
650 | 4 | |a Intrinsic Value | |
650 | 4 | |a Godlikeness | |
650 | 4 | |a Robert Adams | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in Christian ethics |d London : Sage, 1988 |g 25(2012), 4, Seite 418-441 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)368910555 |w (DE-600)2118000-3 |w (DE-576)11946067X |x 0953-9468 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2012 |g number:4 |g pages:418-441 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946812454789 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 25 |j 2012 |e 4 |h 418-441 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4000491334 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1776584880 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211110043352 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-06#03B95FE08B52EB6930F59D096CCE9B305491935D | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |