The Deification of Mary Magdalene
The past 25 years have seen an upsurge of interest in the figure of Mary Magdalene, whose image has been transformed through feminist scholarship from penitent prostitute to prominent disciple of Jesus. This article documents another, non-academic, interpretation of Mary Magdalene – the image of Mar...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2013
|
| In: |
Feminist theology
Year: 2013, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 145-154 |
| Further subjects: | B
Starbird
B Thealogy B Goddess B Christianity B Mary Magdalene |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1776895657 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211111003100.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0966735012462840 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1776895657 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1776895657 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1026827353 |0 (DE-627)727477579 |0 (DE-576)185506925 |4 aut |a Beavis, Mary Ann |d 1955- | |
| 109 | |a Beavis, Mary Ann 1955- |a Beavis, Mary A. 1955- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Deification of Mary Magdalene |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The past 25 years have seen an upsurge of interest in the figure of Mary Magdalene, whose image has been transformed through feminist scholarship from penitent prostitute to prominent disciple of Jesus. This article documents another, non-academic, interpretation of Mary Magdalene – the image of Mary as goddess or embodiment of the female divine. The most influential proponent of this view is Margaret Starbird, who hypothesizes that Mary was both Jesus’ wife and his divine feminine counterpart. The author suggests that feminist theologians/thealogians should (a) be aware of this popular understanding of Mary; and (b) consider what it is about Mary Magdalene as the sacred feminine/Bride of Jesus/Sophia that captures the public imagination in a way that other feminist christologies do not. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Thealogy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Starbird | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mary Magdalene | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Goddess | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Christianity | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Feminist theology |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1992 |g 21(2013), 2, Seite 145-154 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341897612 |w (DE-600)2069502-0 |w (DE-576)254072119 |x 1745-5189 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2013 |g number:2 |g pages:145-154 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1633118959 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735012462840 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 21 |j 2013 |e 2 |h 145-154 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4000802720 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1776895657 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211110045220 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-07-28#4825754EB336243816D0ABE49D577243D0A90B08 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Maria Magdalene,Maria Magdalena |