The Voice of the Historian in the Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean World
Writing history is never a neutral endeavor; it is a personal act in which the historian uses evidence to reconstruct, sometimes to recreate, the past. How, then, did the ancient historians make their presence felt in writing? What do their differences tell us about how they wrote history and unders...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Sage Publ.
2003
|
В: |
Interpretation
Год: 2003, Том: 57, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 117-137 |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Не электронный вид
|
Итог: | Writing history is never a neutral endeavor; it is a personal act in which the historian uses evidence to reconstruct, sometimes to recreate, the past. How, then, did the ancient historians make their presence felt in writing? What do their differences tell us about how they wrote history and understood the world around them? |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2159-340X |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Interpretation
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/002096430005700202 |