Response Concerning Genesis and Statistics
The validity of syllable—word pattern analysis using the chi—square test was rejected in Richard A. O'Keefe's `Critical Remarks on Houk's “Statistical Analysis of Genesis Sources”' (JSOT 29 [2005], pp. 409-37), based on various types of data dependence and multiple comparisons. T...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Sage
2007
|
Στο/Στη: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Έτος: 2007, Τόμος: 32, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 61-67 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
syllable-word
B Hebrew B Genesis B Old Testament B Sources B Statistics B data dependence |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Παράλληλη έκδοση: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή
|
Σύνοψη: | The validity of syllable—word pattern analysis using the chi—square test was rejected in Richard A. O'Keefe's `Critical Remarks on Houk's “Statistical Analysis of Genesis Sources”' (JSOT 29 [2005], pp. 409-37), based on various types of data dependence and multiple comparisons. This article provides a response to O'Keefe's `Critical Remarks', countering each of his claims and showing that independent and distinctive syllable—word patterns in Biblical Hebrew offer a useful tool for the statistical analysis of Old Testament texts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089207083765 |