‘Ambivalence’ at the end of life: How to understand patients’ wishes ethically
Health-care professionals in end-of-life care are frequently confronted with patients who seem to be ‘ambivalent’ about treatment decisions, especially if they express a wish to die. This article investigates this phenomenon by analysing two case stories based on narrative interviews with two patien...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sage
2012
|
| In: |
Nursing ethics
Jahr: 2012, Band: 19, Heft: 5, Seiten: 629-641 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
end of life
B Ambivalence B Narratives B wish to die B patients’ experience B Identity |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Health-care professionals in end-of-life care are frequently confronted with patients who seem to be ‘ambivalent’ about treatment decisions, especially if they express a wish to die. This article investigates this phenomenon by analysing two case stories based on narrative interviews with two patients and their caregivers. First, we argue that a respectful approach to patients requires acknowledging that coexistence of opposing wishes can be part of authentic, multi-layered experiences and moral understandings at the end of life. Second, caregivers need to understand when contradictory statements point to tensions in a patient’s moral experience that require support. Third, caregivers should be careful not to negatively label or even pathologize seemingly contradictory patient statements. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-0989 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Nursing ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0969733011436206 |