‘Ambivalence’ at the end of life: How to understand patients’ wishes ethically
Health-care professionals in end-of-life care are frequently confronted with patients who seem to be ‘ambivalent’ about treatment decisions, especially if they express a wish to die. This article investigates this phenomenon by analysing two case stories based on narrative interviews with two patien...
| Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Sage
2012
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Nursing ethics
Έτος: 2012, Τόμος: 19, Τεύχος: 5, Σελίδες: 629-641 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
end of life
B Ambivalence B Narratives B wish to die B patients’ experience B Identity |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | Health-care professionals in end-of-life care are frequently confronted with patients who seem to be ‘ambivalent’ about treatment decisions, especially if they express a wish to die. This article investigates this phenomenon by analysing two case stories based on narrative interviews with two patients and their caregivers. First, we argue that a respectful approach to patients requires acknowledging that coexistence of opposing wishes can be part of authentic, multi-layered experiences and moral understandings at the end of life. Second, caregivers need to understand when contradictory statements point to tensions in a patient’s moral experience that require support. Third, caregivers should be careful not to negatively label or even pathologize seemingly contradictory patient statements. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-0989 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Nursing ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0969733011436206 |