Psychometric evaluation of the Moral Distress Risk Scale: A methodological study
Background:Moral distress is a kind of suffering that nurses may experience when they act in ways that are considered inconsistent with moral values, leading to a perceived compromise of moral integrity. Consequences are mostly negative and include physical and psychological symptoms, in addition to...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Sage
2019
|
| Em: |
Nursing ethics
Ano: 2019, Volume: 26, Número: 2, Páginas: 434-442 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Instrument development
B Ethics B statistical B Nursing B Factor analysis B Moral Distress B Validation studies |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | Background:Moral distress is a kind of suffering that nurses may experience when they act in ways that are considered inconsistent with moral values, leading to a perceived compromise of moral integrity. Consequences are mostly negative and include physical and psychological symptoms, in addition to organizational implications.Objective:To psychometrically test the Moral Distress Risk Scale.Research design:A methodological study was realized. Data were submitted to exploratory factorial analysis through the SPSS statistical program.Participants and research context:In total, 268 nurses from hospitals and primary healthcare settings participated in this research during the period of March to June of 2016.Ethical considerations:This research has ethics committee approval.Findings:The Moral Distress Risk Scale is composed of 7 factors and 30 items; it shows evidence of acceptable reliability and validity with a Cronbach’s α = 0.913, a total variance explained of 59%, a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin = 0.896, and a significant Bartlett <0.001.Discussion:Concerns about moral distress should be beyond acute care settings, and a tool to help clarify critical points in other healthcare contexts may add value to moral distress speech.Conclusion:Psychometric results reveal that the Moral Distress Risk Scale can be applied in different healthcare contexts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-0989 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Nursing ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0969733017707347 |