Midwifery students’ reactions to ethical dilemmas encountered in outpatient clinics

Background:Midwives are required to make ethical decisions with the support of respective codes of professional ethics which provide a framework for decision making in clinical practice. While each midwife should be ethically aware and sensitive to the ever-changing issues within reproduction, few e...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Ejder Apay, Serap (Author) ; Gürol, Ayşe (Author) ; Gür, Elif Yağmur (Author) ; Church, Sarah (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Sage 2020
Em: Nursing ethics
Ano: 2020, Volume: 27, Número: 7, Páginas: 1542-1555
Outras palavras-chave:B Reproduction
B Students
B Midwifery
B Ethical Dilemma
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779459807
003 DE-627
005 20211126113506.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211126s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0969733020922875  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779459807 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779459807 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ejder Apay, Serap  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Midwifery students’ reactions to ethical dilemmas encountered in outpatient clinics 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Background:Midwives are required to make ethical decisions with the support of respective codes of professional ethics which provide a framework for decision making in clinical practice. While each midwife should be ethically aware and sensitive to the ever-changing issues within reproduction, few empirical studies have examined the views of student midwives in relation to reproductive ethical dilemmas.Objective:The aim of this study was to explore midwifery students’ reactions to a number of ethical dilemmas relating to women’s experiences of reproductive decision making.Design:A series of focus groups were conducted with midwifery students who were asked to discuss five culturally significant scenarios including issues of knowledge acquisition regarding methods of family planning, removal or insertion of an intrauterine device, and abortion.Setting:A University in Turkey was the setting for this study.Participants:Purposeful sampling was adopted which resulted in five focus groups with a total of 57 midwifery students.Ethical considerations:The study was reviewed and granted formal ethical approval by an ethical committee at the Faculty of Health Science in Atatürk University. The head of the Faculty of Health Science approved the investigation. The participants received both oral and written information about the study and they gave their consent.Results:Five themes were identified from the analysis of the focus group data related to all five scenarios. These themes were ‘the right to information’, ‘choice and protection’, ‘parental rights and welfare of the women’, ‘make a decision’ and ‘women rights and sexual abuse’.Conclusion:This study has shown that while students respected women’s choice, they also expressed great ambivalence in some situations when personal values conflict with dominant societal beliefs and professional ethics. A focus on ethics education to include human rights is suggested as a means to enable students to explore their own social-value judgements, and as a means to limit the possible development of ethical confusion and moral distress. 
601 |a Student 
601 |a Dilemma 
650 4 |a Students 
650 4 |a Reproduction 
650 4 |a Midwifery 
650 4 |a Ethical Dilemma 
700 1 |a Gürol, Ayşe  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gür, Elif Yağmur  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Church, Sarah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 27(2020), 7, Seite 1542-1555  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2020  |g number:7  |g pages:1542-1555 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020922875  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 27  |j 2020  |e 7  |h 1542-1555 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008133836 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779459807 
LOK |0 005 20211126113506 
LOK |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#A8E098B7DF867AA0A0AF3CB8E4CC9EBA180F5487 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw