Religious education for free and equal citizens
The aim of this article is to interact critically with Matthew Clayton and David Stevens’s recent critique of non-confessional religious education, constituted as a separate, compulsory subject in the school curriculum. Three different critical arguments are considered: the contention that religious...
| Published in: | British Journal of religious education |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2022
|
| In: |
British Journal of religious education
|
| Further subjects: | B
Intolerance
B Religious Education B Toleration B Educational Policy B Rawls |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 177973316X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211215164430.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211129s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/01416200.2020.1854687 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)177973316X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP177973316X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1043877207 |0 (DE-627)771024223 |0 (DE-576)395996198 |4 aut |a Barnes, Philip | |
| 109 | |a Barnes, Philip |a Barnes, L. Philip | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious education for free and equal citizens |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The aim of this article is to interact critically with Matthew Clayton and David Stevens’s recent critique of non-confessional religious education, constituted as a separate, compulsory subject in the school curriculum. Three different critical arguments are considered: the contention that religious education is an unsuitable vehicle for fostering toleration and mutual understanding; their framing and application of an ‘acceptability requirement’ to religious education, which states that government principles and policy should be justified by reasons that cannot be rejected by reasonable citizens, and which they believe religious education fails; and finally, their rejection of the view that religious education fulfils a democratic purpose in providing pupils with the competences to consider and assess religious claims to truth. Religious education is defended against all three charges. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Toleration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intolerance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Educational Policy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t British Journal of religious education |d London : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1978 |g 44(2022), 1, Seite 4-13 |w (DE-627)385031394 |w (DE-600)2142067-1 |w (DE-576)258360356 |x 1740-7931 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g pages:4-13 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2020.1854687 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 44 |j 2022 |e 1 |h 4-13 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4008670068 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 177973316X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211129042540 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211129||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-11-28#8CC8AF0C3728C5CCDD09F452C1C35ED6D39DF254 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||