NON-THERAPEUTIC MODIFICATION AND SELF-INTEREST: REPLY TO SCHRAMME
In this article I reply to Thomas Schramme's argument that there are no good reasons for the prohibition of severe forms of voluntary non-therapeutic body modification. I argue that on paternalistic assumptions there is, in fact, a perfectly good reason.
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | 電子 Article |
語言: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
出版: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2008
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2008, 卷: 22, 發布: 8, Pages: 455-456 |
Further subjects: | B
Well-being
B Self interest B Paternalism B body modification |
在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |