NON-THERAPEUTIC MODIFICATION AND SELF-INTEREST: REPLY TO SCHRAMME
In this article I reply to Thomas Schramme's argument that there are no good reasons for the prohibition of severe forms of voluntary non-therapeutic body modification. I argue that on paternalistic assumptions there is, in fact, a perfectly good reason.
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2008
|
В: |
Bioethics
Год: 2008, Том: 22, Выпуск: 8, Страницы: 455-456 |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Well-being
B Self interest B Paternalism B body modification |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | In this article I reply to Thomas Schramme's argument that there are no good reasons for the prohibition of severe forms of voluntary non-therapeutic body modification. I argue that on paternalistic assumptions there is, in fact, a perfectly good reason. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-8519 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Bioethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00668.x |