WHO'S ARGUING? A CALL FOR REFLEXIVITY IN BIOETHICS
In this paper we set forth what we believe to be a relatively controversial argument, claiming that ‘bioethics’ needs to undergo a fundamental change in the way it is practised. This change, we argue, requires philosophical bioethicists to adopt reflexive practices when applying their analyses in pu...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2010
|
| Dans: |
Bioethics
Année: 2010, Volume: 24, Numéro: 5, Pages: 256-265 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
moral assumption
B Reflexivity B empirical bioethics B Bioethics B Moral Intuition B critical bioethics |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781882444 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211042805.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01809.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781882444 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781882444 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ives, Jonathan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a WHO'S ARGUING? A CALL FOR REFLEXIVITY IN BIOETHICS |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper we set forth what we believe to be a relatively controversial argument, claiming that ‘bioethics’ needs to undergo a fundamental change in the way it is practised. This change, we argue, requires philosophical bioethicists to adopt reflexive practices when applying their analyses in public forums, acknowledging openly that bioethics is an embedded socio-cultural practice, shaped by the ever-changing intuitions of individual philosophers, which cannot be viewed as a detached intellectual endeavour. This said, we argue that in order to manage the personal, social and cultural embeddedness of bioethics, philosophical bioethicists should openly acknowledge how their practices are constructed and should, in their writing, explicitly deal with issues of bias and conflict of interest, just as empirical scientists are required to do. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a moral assumption | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral Intuition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a empirical bioethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical bioethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reflexivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dunn, Michael |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 24(2010), 5, Seite 256-265 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2010 |g number:5 |g pages:256-265 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01809.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01809.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 24 |j 2010 |e 5 |h 256-265 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4019005427 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781882444 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211042805 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#555A7826081143156B64CB0D2E0F1696522FA23C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||