RT Article
T1 FOR HOMEOPATHY: A PRACTISING PHYSICIAN'S PERSPECTIVE
JF Bioethics
VO 26
IS 9
SP 499
OP 500
A1 Moskowitz, Richard
LA English
PB Wiley-Blackwell
YR 2012
UL https://www.ixtheo.de/Record/1781884161
AB This article is a rebuttal to Kevin Smith's ‘Against Homeopathy,’ which was posted on 14 February 2011.1 It contends that his argument rests entirely on the assumption that homeopathic remedies are nothing but placebos. His argumentation is good, but his assumption is false. Evidence is presented to show that the Law of Similars is plausible and that ultradilute remedies do indeed have biological activity.
K1 infinitesimal doses
K1 the law of similars
K1 biological activity
K1 Placebo
K1 Homeopathy
DO 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01949.x