Gilles Deleuze and Michel Henry: Critical Contrasts in the Deduction of Life as Transcendental
To address the theological turn in phenomenology, this paper sets out critical arguments opposing the theist phenomenology of Michel Henry and Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of the event. Henry’s phenomenology has been overlooked in recent commentaries compared with, for example, Jean-Luc Marion’s work...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2008
|
In: |
Sophia
Year: 2008, Volume: 47, Issue: 3, Pages: 265-279 |
Further subjects: | B
Transcendental
B Auto-affection B Michel Henry B Event B Suffering B Gilles Deleuze B Affect |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 178559012X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220112043352.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11841-008-0073-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)178559012X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178559012X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Williams, James |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Gilles Deleuze and Michel Henry: Critical Contrasts in the Deduction of Life as Transcendental |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a To address the theological turn in phenomenology, this paper sets out critical arguments opposing the theist phenomenology of Michel Henry and Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of the event. Henry’s phenomenology has been overlooked in recent commentaries compared with, for example, Jean-Luc Marion’s work. It will be shown here that Henry’s philosophy presents a detailed novel turn in phenomenology structured according to critical moves against positions developed from Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. This demonstration is done through a strong contrast with Deleuze and a short engagement with Quentin Meillassoux. The paper presents an argument against the theological turn on the grounds that it misunderstands the form of affectivity when compared to Deleuze’s work on affect and event. It will be argued that Henry’s search for a free-standing affect deduced as a condition for any appearance underplays the way any affect is included in many causal and transcendentally determined series such that any notion of the pure affect independent of other processes is a fiction. The loss of this pure affect entails the questioning of the theological turn in Henry. | ||
601 | |a Henry, Michel | ||
650 | 4 | |a Suffering | |
650 | 4 | |a Transcendental | |
650 | 4 | |a Michel Henry | |
650 | 4 | |a Gilles Deleuze | |
650 | 4 | |a Event | |
650 | 4 | |a Auto-affection | |
650 | 4 | |a Affect | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 47(2008), 3, Seite 265-279 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2008 |g number:3 |g pages:265-279 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-008-0073-4 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 47 |j 2008 |e 3 |h 265-279 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033648992 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 178559012X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112043352 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#BD360669032BA7E36A88F5DA23CF02E9B9B5FDDA | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |