‘Foolishness to Greeks’: Plantinga and the Epistemology of Christian Belief

A central theme in the Christian contemplative tradition is that knowing God is much more like ‘unknowing’ than it is like possessing rationally acceptable beliefs. Knowledge of God is expressed, in this tradition, in metaphors of woundedness, darkness, silence, suffering, and desire. Philosophers o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bachelard, Sarah (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands 2009
In: Sophia
Year: 2009, Volume: 48, Issue: 2, Pages: 105-118
Further subjects:B Unknowing
B Epistemology of Christian belief
B Alvin Plantinga
B Christian Spirituality
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785590324
003 DE-627
005 20220113002649.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-009-0102-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785590324 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785590324 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1047316978  |0 (DE-627)778100758  |0 (DE-576)398170916  |4 aut  |a Bachelard, Sarah 
109 |a Bachelard, Sarah 
245 1 0 |a ‘Foolishness to Greeks’: Plantinga and the Epistemology of Christian Belief 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A central theme in the Christian contemplative tradition is that knowing God is much more like ‘unknowing’ than it is like possessing rationally acceptable beliefs. Knowledge of God is expressed, in this tradition, in metaphors of woundedness, darkness, silence, suffering, and desire. Philosophers of religion, on the other hand, tend to explore the possibilities of knowing God in terms of rational acceptability, epistemic rights, cognitive responsibility, and propositional belief. These languages seem to point to very different accounts of how it is that we come to know God, and a very different range of critical concepts by which the truth of such knowledge can be assessed. In this paper, I begin to explore what might be at stake in these different languages of knowing God, drawing particularly on Alvin Plantinga’s epistemology of Christian belief. I will argue that his is a distorted account of the epistemology of Christian belief, and that this has implications for his project of demonstrating the rational acceptability of Christian faith for the 21st century. 
650 4 |a Unknowing 
650 4 |a Christian Spirituality 
650 4 |a Epistemology of Christian belief 
650 4 |a Alvin Plantinga 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 48(2009), 2, Seite 105-118  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2009  |g number:2  |g pages:105-118 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-009-0102-y  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 48  |j 2009  |e 2  |h 105-118 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033649190 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785590324 
LOK |0 005 20220112043353 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#EEE9E8A702FDCCF2D3AA15BE6778A56AF41697EC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw