Against the possibility of historical evidence for miracles
In his bookThe Concept of Miracle and his paper ‘For the Possibility of Miracles’ Swinburne claims that there are no logical difficulties in supposing that there could be strong historical evidence for the occurrence of miracles. This claim is based on three assertions; two of which I demonstrate ar...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Springer Netherlands
2005
|
Em: |
Sophia
Ano: 2005, Volume: 44, Número: 1, Páginas: 7-23 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Historical Evidence
B Prior Evidence B Natural Event B Present Event B Rational Agent |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Resumo: | In his bookThe Concept of Miracle and his paper ‘For the Possibility of Miracles’ Swinburne claims that there are no logical difficulties in supposing that there could be strong historical evidence for the occurrence of miracles. This claim is based on three assertions; two of which I demonstrate are only true contingently. In this paper I identify several logical difficulties regarding the possibility of attaining historical evidence for the occurrence of miracles. On the strength of these logical difficulties I hope to demonstrate that there is sufficient reason to doubt Swinburne’s central claim. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF02780480 |