Asymmetric Perceptions of Ethical Frameworks of Men and Women in Business and Nonbusiness Settings
This paper examines the relationship between individuals' gender and their ethical decision models. The study seeks to identify asymmetries in men's and women's approaches to ethical decision making and differences in their perceptions of how same-sex and other-sex managers would like...
Auteurs: | ; |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1997
|
Dans: |
Journal of business ethics
Année: 1997, Volume: 16, Numéro: 7, Pages: 719-729 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Decision Making
B Decision Model B Ethical Decision B Economic Growth B Good Predictor |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This paper examines the relationship between individuals' gender and their ethical decision models. The study seeks to identify asymmetries in men's and women's approaches to ethical decision making and differences in their perceptions of how same-sex and other-sex managers would likely act in business and nonbusiness situations that present an ethical dilemma. Results indicate that the models employed by men and women differ in both business and nonbusiness settings, that both sexes report changing models when leaving business settings, and that women were better predictors of both sex's likely ethical models. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1023/A:1017953626566 |