Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports

In this article we explore how multinational corporations (MNCs) adopt assurance practices to develop and sustain organizational accountability for sustainability. Using a panel of Fortune Global 250 firms over a period of 10 years, we document the diffusion patterns of third-party assurance of sust...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Perego, Paolo (Auteur) ; Kolk, Ans (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2012
Dans: Journal of business ethics
Année: 2012, Volume: 110, Numéro: 2, Pages: 173-190
Sujets non-standardisés:B Assurance statements
B Assurance
B Sustainability
B Accountability
B Accountants
B Verification
B Multinationals
B Reporting
B Standards
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:In this article we explore how multinational corporations (MNCs) adopt assurance practices to develop and sustain organizational accountability for sustainability. Using a panel of Fortune Global 250 firms over a period of 10 years, we document the diffusion patterns of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. We specifically investigate how evolving auditing practices, namely diversity of assurance standards and type of assurance providers, shape the quality of sustainability assurance statements. The results illustrate great variability in the adoption of assurance practices in the formative stages of this novel market. Our descriptive analysis indicates the relevance of external institutional pressures as well as internal resources and capabilities as underlying factors driving the adoption of assurance. Our evidence also suggests that several MNCs project a decoupled or symbolic image of accountability through assurance, thereby undermining the credibility of these verification practices. The paper contributes to the emerging literature on international accountability standards and emphasizes the need to enhance theory-based, cross-disciplinary knowledge related to auditing and accountability processes for sustainability.
ISSN:1573-0697
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5