Global Sustainability Governance and the UN Global Compact: A Rejoinder to Critics
This article takes the critique by Sethi and Schepers (J Bus Ethics, 2013, in this thematic symposium) as a starting point for discussing the United Nations (UNs) Global Compact. While acknowledging the relevance of some of their arguments, we emphasize that a number of their claims remain arguable...
VerfasserInnen: | ; |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2014
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Jahr: 2014, Band: 122, Heft: 2, Seiten: 209-216 |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
public–private partnerships
B United Nations Global Compact B Business regulation B Soft Law B Corporate sustainability and responsibility |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785651129 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230331053429.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2216-6 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785651129 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785651129 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-014-2216-6-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rasche, Andreas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Global Sustainability Governance and the UN Global Compact: A Rejoinder to Critics |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article takes the critique by Sethi and Schepers (J Bus Ethics, 2013, in this thematic symposium) as a starting point for discussing the United Nations (UNs) Global Compact. While acknowledging the relevance of some of their arguments, we emphasize that a number of their claims remain arguable and are partly misleading. We start by discussing the limits of their proposed framework to classify voluntary initiatives for corporate sustainability and responsibility. Next, we show how a greater appreciation of the historical and political context of the UN Global Compact puts several of their claims into perspective. Finally, we demonstrate that the alleged promise–performance gap rests on a selected and one-sided reading of the initiative. We close by pointing to some challenges that the initiative needs to address in the future. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Soft Law | |
650 | 4 | |a public–private partnerships | |
650 | 4 | |a Corporate sustainability and responsibility | |
650 | 4 | |a Business regulation | |
650 | 4 | |a United Nations Global Compact | |
700 | 1 | |a Waddock, Sandra |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 122(2014), 2, Seite 209-216 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:122 |g year:2014 |g number:2 |g pages:209-216 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/42921429 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2216-6 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 122 |j 2014 |e 2 |h 209-216 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033710019 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785651129 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112043812 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#C52B3FA351BC5B42391097F1AABFB6C470CEFD40 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/42921429 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |