Ethical Reasoning in Action: Validity Evidence for the Ethical Reasoning Identification Test (ERIT)

Professionals in business and law, healthcare providers, educators, policymakers, consumers, and higher education practitioners value ethical reasoning (ER) skills. Because of this, we concentrated campus-wide reaccreditation efforts to help students actively engage in ER. In doing so, we re-concept...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori: Smith, Kristen (Autore) ; Fulcher, Keston (Autore) ; Sanchez, Elizabeth Hawk (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2017
In: Journal of business ethics
Anno: 2017, Volume: 144, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 417-436
Altre parole chiave:B Known groups validity
B Ethical reasoning skills
B Confirmatory Factor Analysis
B Internal validity
B The eight key questions
Accesso online: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785661906
003 DE-627
005 20230331053735.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2841-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785661906 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785661906 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2841-8-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Smith, Kristen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ethical Reasoning in Action: Validity Evidence for the Ethical Reasoning Identification Test (ERIT) 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Professionals in business and law, healthcare providers, educators, policymakers, consumers, and higher education practitioners value ethical reasoning (ER) skills. Because of this, we concentrated campus-wide reaccreditation efforts to help students actively engage in ER. In doing so, we re-conceptualized the ER process, implemented campus-wide ER interventions designed to be experienced by all undergraduate students, and created the ethical reasoning identification test (ERIT) to measure students’ ability to engage in a foundational step in the ER process. Using factor analysis, we demonstrated internal validity evidence for ERIT scores. More specifically, confirmatory factor analysis provided support for a unidimensional factor structure, meaning stakeholders can report and analyze ERIT total scores. The unidimensional factor structure was replicated using two independent samples. Across all samples, ERIT scores demonstrated reliability consistent with professional standards. In addition, we collected external validity evidence for ERIT scores. The ERIT was sensitive to slight differences in ER training. That is, students experiencing a 75-min intervention performed better on the test compared to students without this experience. Overall, results suggested that our ER intervention may effectively increase students ER abilities and the ERIT demonstrated great potential for assessing foundational ethical reasoning skills. To further examine validity, researchers should consider known groups analyses with varying “doses” of the ER intervention, as well as measurement invariance studies. 
650 4 |a Internal validity 
650 4 |a Known groups validity 
650 4 |a Confirmatory Factor Analysis 
650 4 |a The eight key questions 
650 4 |a Ethical reasoning skills 
700 1 |a Fulcher, Keston  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sanchez, Elizabeth Hawk  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 144(2017), 2, Seite 417-436  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:144  |g year:2017  |g number:2  |g pages:417-436 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022270  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2841-8  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 144  |j 2017  |e 2  |h 417-436 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033720804 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785661906 
LOK |0 005 20220112043858 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#354C60CAD3142C7BFED700FC2D67952C7A1CF7DA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022270 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw