Ethical Reasoning in Action: Validity Evidence for the Ethical Reasoning Identification Test (ERIT)
Professionals in business and law, healthcare providers, educators, policymakers, consumers, and higher education practitioners value ethical reasoning (ER) skills. Because of this, we concentrated campus-wide reaccreditation efforts to help students actively engage in ER. In doing so, we re-concept...
Autori: | ; ; |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2017
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Anno: 2017, Volume: 144, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 417-436 |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Known groups validity
B Ethical reasoning skills B Confirmatory Factor Analysis B Internal validity B The eight key questions |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785661906 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230331053735.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2841-8 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785661906 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785661906 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2841-8-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Smith, Kristen |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethical Reasoning in Action: Validity Evidence for the Ethical Reasoning Identification Test (ERIT) |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Professionals in business and law, healthcare providers, educators, policymakers, consumers, and higher education practitioners value ethical reasoning (ER) skills. Because of this, we concentrated campus-wide reaccreditation efforts to help students actively engage in ER. In doing so, we re-conceptualized the ER process, implemented campus-wide ER interventions designed to be experienced by all undergraduate students, and created the ethical reasoning identification test (ERIT) to measure students’ ability to engage in a foundational step in the ER process. Using factor analysis, we demonstrated internal validity evidence for ERIT scores. More specifically, confirmatory factor analysis provided support for a unidimensional factor structure, meaning stakeholders can report and analyze ERIT total scores. The unidimensional factor structure was replicated using two independent samples. Across all samples, ERIT scores demonstrated reliability consistent with professional standards. In addition, we collected external validity evidence for ERIT scores. The ERIT was sensitive to slight differences in ER training. That is, students experiencing a 75-min intervention performed better on the test compared to students without this experience. Overall, results suggested that our ER intervention may effectively increase students ER abilities and the ERIT demonstrated great potential for assessing foundational ethical reasoning skills. To further examine validity, researchers should consider known groups analyses with varying “doses” of the ER intervention, as well as measurement invariance studies. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Internal validity | |
650 | 4 | |a Known groups validity | |
650 | 4 | |a Confirmatory Factor Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a The eight key questions | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethical reasoning skills | |
700 | 1 | |a Fulcher, Keston |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sanchez, Elizabeth Hawk |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 144(2017), 2, Seite 417-436 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:144 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:417-436 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022270 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2841-8 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 144 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 417-436 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033720804 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785661906 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112043858 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#354C60CAD3142C7BFED700FC2D67952C7A1CF7DA | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022270 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |