A Woman's Choice? — On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion

This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology hav...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Søbirk Petersen, Thomas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2004
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2004, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 81-90
Further subjects:B Women
B Ethics
B Feminism
B Assisted Reproduction
B IVF
B Autonomy
B Coercion
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 178569300X
003 DE-627
005 20220112044052.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/B:ETTA.0000019974.63427.ea  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)178569300X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178569300X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Søbirk Petersen, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Woman's Choice? — On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion 
264 1 |c 2004 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology have been socially coerced into desiring children - and indeed have thereby been harmed by the patriarchal society in which they live. I call this the argument from coercion., Having clarified this argument, I conclude that although it addresses important issues, it is highly problematic for the following reasons. First, if women are being coerced to desire to use AR, we should eradicate the coercive elements in pro-natalist ideology, not access to AR. Second, the argument seems to have the absurd implication that we should prevent all woman, whether fertile or not, to try to have children. Third, it seems probable that women's welfare will be greater if we let well informed and decision-competent women decide for themselves whether they want to use AR. 
650 4 |a Women 
650 4 |a IVF 
650 4 |a Feminism 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Coercion 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
650 4 |a Assisted Reproduction 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 7(2004), 1, Seite 81-90  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:2004  |g number:1  |g pages:81-90 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504296  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETTA.0000019974.63427.ea  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 7  |j 2004  |e 1  |h 81-90 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033751904 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178569300X 
LOK |0 005 20220112044052 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#126F4FD07B61B332C06C26C9BDCAC0C8C1A2BCE1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504296 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw