Teleology, Deontology, and the Priority of the Right: On Some Unappreciated Distinctions
The paper analyses Rawls’s teleology/deontology distinction, and his concept of priority of the right. The first part of the paper aims both 1) to clarify what is distinctive about Rawls’s deontology/teleology distinction (thus sorting out some existing confusion in the literature, especially regard...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2010
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2010, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Pages: 453-472 |
Further subjects: | B
justice as fairness
B John Rawls B good distinction / Right B Utilitarianism B Neutrality B Consequentialism vs nonconsequentialism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785695770 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220112044102.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-009-9209-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785695770 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785695770 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ronzoni, Miriam |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Teleology, Deontology, and the Priority of the Right: On Some Unappreciated Distinctions |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The paper analyses Rawls’s teleology/deontology distinction, and his concept of priority of the right. The first part of the paper aims both 1) to clarify what is distinctive about Rawls’s deontology/teleology distinction (thus sorting out some existing confusion in the literature, especially regarding the conflation of such distinction with that between consequentialism and nonconsequentialism); and 2) to cash out the rich taxonomy of moral theories that such a distinction helpfully allows us to develop. The second part of the paper examines the concept of priority of the right. It argues that such a concept should not be identified with that of deontology—indeed, deontological theories do not necessarily assign priority to the right over the good. However, it contends that the concept of priority of the right is essential to explaining what specific kind of deontological theory “justice as fairness” is. Justice as fairness is a deontological theory which assigns priority to the right as a consequence of its commitment to a neutral position with respect to different accounts of what is ultimately valuable and good. | ||
601 | |a Teleologie | ||
601 | |a Deontologie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Consequentialism vs nonconsequentialism | |
650 | 4 | |a Utilitarianism | |
650 | 4 | |a Neutrality | |
650 | 4 | |a justice as fairness | |
650 | 4 | |a John Rawls | |
650 | 4 | |a Right/good distinction | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 13(2010), 4, Seite 453-472 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2010 |g number:4 |g pages:453-472 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835362 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9209-z |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 13 |j 2010 |e 4 |h 453-472 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033754679 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785695770 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112044102 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#8702F08A0E91396B397C6DCEF2B4FB8A1C20829B | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835362 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |