Rational Choice and Moral Theory
Contemporary discussions of the positive relation between rational choice and moral theory are a special case of a much older tradition that seeks to show that mutual agreement upon certain moral rules works to the mutual advantage, or in the interests, of those who so agree. I make a few remarks ab...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2010
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2010, Volume: 13, Issue: 5, Pages: 521-540 |
Further subjects: | B
Game Theory
B Rational choice B Bargaining B Morgenstern B Von Neumann B Moral Theory B Nash B Harsanyi B Gauthier B Rawls |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785695894 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220112044103.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-010-9253-8 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785695894 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785695894 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a McClennen, Edward F. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rational Choice and Moral Theory |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Contemporary discussions of the positive relation between rational choice and moral theory are a special case of a much older tradition that seeks to show that mutual agreement upon certain moral rules works to the mutual advantage, or in the interests, of those who so agree. I make a few remarks about the history of discussions of the connection between morality and self-interest, after which I argue that the modern theory of rational choice can be naturally understood as a continuation of this older tradition. I then go on to argue for a controversial three-fold thesis: (1) that grounding a theory of morality in terms of rational self-interest is the only epistemologically respectable way to proceed with the justification of moral principles; (2) that despite this, most of the contemporary explorations of rational choice foundations for moral principles do not work—that the models of rational choice to which they appeal yield less than the substantial results that they are intended to yield; but (3) that if one rethinks just what it means to be rational, one can find in fact a promising way to connect the two—specifically through the development of a theory of genuinely cooperative activity. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Von Neumann | |
650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
650 | 4 | |a Rational Choice | |
650 | 4 | |a Nash | |
650 | 4 | |a Morgenstern | |
650 | 4 | |a Moral Theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Harsanyi | |
650 | 4 | |a Gauthier | |
650 | 4 | |a Game Theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Bargaining | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 13(2010), 5, Seite 521-540 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2010 |g number:5 |g pages:521-540 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40983549 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-010-9253-8 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 13 |j 2010 |e 5 |h 521-540 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033754792 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785695894 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112044103 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#E166237894446068F3366E34CE36069F0F73EC84 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40983549 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Rational choice |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Théorie du choix rationnel |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Elección racional |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Scelta razionale,Teoria della scelta razionale,Teoria della scelta razionale |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 理性选择,理性决择 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 理性選擇,理性決擇 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Escolha racional |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Теория рационального выбора |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ορθολογική επιλογή,Θεωρία της ορθολογικής επιλογής |
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Rational-Choice-Ansatz,Rational-Choice-Theorie,Rationales Handeln,Rationale Entscheidung,Werterwartungstheorie |