Regimes of Autonomy

Like being able to drive a car, being autonomous is a socially attributed, claimed, and contested status. Normative debates about criteria for autonomy (and what autonomy entitles one to) are best understood, not as debates about what autonomy, at core, really is, but rather as debates about the rel...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Joel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2014
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2014, Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Pages: 355-368
Further subjects:B physician-assisted suicide
B Paternalism
B Pragmatism
B Pension policy
B Ascriptivism
B Competency
B Autonomy
B Neoliberalism
B Perfectionism
B Solidarism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 178569815X
003 DE-627
005 20220112044112.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-013-9448-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)178569815X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178569815X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Anderson, Joel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Regimes of Autonomy 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Like being able to drive a car, being autonomous is a socially attributed, claimed, and contested status. Normative debates about criteria for autonomy (and what autonomy entitles one to) are best understood, not as debates about what autonomy, at core, really is, but rather as debates about the relative merits of various possible packages of thresholds, entitlements, regulations, values, and institutions. Within different “regimes” of autonomy, different criteria for (degrees of) autonomy become authoritative. Neoliberal, solidaristic, and perfectionist regimes entail conflicting understandings of what gets you autonomy and what autonomy gets you—for example, in relation to policies regarding physician-assisted suicide or financial support for senior citizens. In light of this, justifying a particular understanding of autonomy is inseparable from the task of arguing for the context-specific merits of a regime of autonomy as a whole and in relation to other ethical and political commitments. 
601 |a Autonomie 
650 4 |a Pension policy 
650 4 |a physician-assisted suicide 
650 4 |a Perfectionism 
650 4 |a Neoliberalism 
650 4 |a Solidarism 
650 4 |a Ascriptivism 
650 4 |a Pragmatism 
650 4 |a Competency 
650 4 |a Paternalism 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 17(2014), 3, Seite 355-368  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:355-368 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24478653  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9448-x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 17  |j 2014  |e 3  |h 355-368 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033757058 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178569815X 
LOK |0 005 20220112044112 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#1B010D5DFA4861A1FB8C3605605EC2302173BFD8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24478653 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw