Moral Responsibility: Justifying Strawson and the Excuse of Peculiarly Unfortunate Formative Circumstances
P.F. Strawson’s theory of moral responsibility remains eminently influential. However, moral philosophers such as G. Watson and T.M. Scanlon have called into question it explanatory basis, which grounds moral responsibility in human nature and interpersonal relationships. They demand a deeper normat...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2014
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2014, Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Pages: 545-557 |
| Further subjects: | B
Strawson
B Excuses B Externalism B Reactive attitudes B Moral Responsibility |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785698281 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112044112.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-013-9457-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785698281 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785698281 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ciurria, Michelle |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Moral Responsibility: Justifying Strawson and the Excuse of Peculiarly Unfortunate Formative Circumstances |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a P.F. Strawson’s theory of moral responsibility remains eminently influential. However, moral philosophers such as G. Watson and T.M. Scanlon have called into question it explanatory basis, which grounds moral responsibility in human nature and interpersonal relationships. They demand a deeper normative explanation for when it is appropriate to modify or mollify the reactive attitudes. In this paper, following A. Sneddon, I argue that the best interpretation of Strawson is an externalistic one which construes moral responsibility as an interpersonal social competence, as this approach uniquely satisfies Strawson’s demand that we justify the reactive attitudes from within the participant perspective. I then show that this is the only interpretation capable of preserving Strawson’s well-known excuse of being peculiarly unfortunate in one’s formative circumstances. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Externalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Excuses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reactive attitudes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Strawson | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral Responsibility | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 17(2014), 3, Seite 545-557 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g pages:545-557 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24478666 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9457-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 17 |j 2014 |e 3 |h 545-557 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 403375718X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785698281 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044112 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#98BA29180D900D62E4ED460DA2F50A1E4A34AE33 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24478666 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||