Realized Eschatology at Corinth

C. K. Barrett, F. F. Bruce and E. Käsemann very briefly state, almost in passing, that difficulties at Corinth arose from an over-realized eschatology. In C. K. Barrett's words, the Corinthians were behaving ‘as if the age to come were already consummated…For them there is no “not yet” to quali...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Thiselton, Anthony C. 1937- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Cambridge Univ. Press 1978
Em: New Testament studies
Ano: 1978, Volume: 24, Número: 4, Páginas: 510-526
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Não eletrônico
Descrição
Resumo:C. K. Barrett, F. F. Bruce and E. Käsemann very briefly state, almost in passing, that difficulties at Corinth arose from an over-realized eschatology. In C. K. Barrett's words, the Corinthians were behaving ‘as if the age to come were already consummated…For them there is no “not yet” to qualify the “already” of realized eschatology.’ This claim, however, needs to be argued more closely, and objections to it considered, since it remains a matter of controversy. The most recent attack on this diagnosis of the situation at Corinth comes from E. Earle Ellis. He argues, firstly, that the error in I Cor. xv ‘offers doubtful support for an eschatological interpretation of I Cor. 4. 8’, and secondly, that it is unlikely that Paul would criticize the Corinthians ‘merely for appropriating an eschatological perspective that he himself has taught’.
ISSN:1469-8145
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: New Testament studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S002868850001451X