Is there Stylometric Evidence for Q?
Stylometric tests were run to assess whether, in Matthew, Q material differs in style from that of M. Correspondence Analysis was used on larger samples. Then counts of the five most frequent words in smaller samples were tested using three further methods: GLM, Discriminant Analysis and Cluster Ana...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2011
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Anno: 2011, Volume: 57, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 483-507 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
stylometry
B Gospels B Synoptic B Statistics B Greek B Source |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Edizione parallela: | Elettronico
|
| Riepilogo: | Stylometric tests were run to assess whether, in Matthew, Q material differs in style from that of M. Correspondence Analysis was used on larger samples. Then counts of the five most frequent words in smaller samples were tested using three further methods: GLM, Discriminant Analysis and Cluster Analysis. These tests assigned about 80% of the samples to the expected source. This result permits a cautious preference for the Two Source Theory against the theory upheld by Farrer, Goulder and Goodacre. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S002868851100018X |