Krizė, (neapsi)sprendimas?: Nuo Carlo Schmitto prie raštininko Bartlbio = Crisis, (Non)Decision? : From Carl Schmitt to Bartleby the Scrivener
The article deals with the concept of "decision" related with the concept of "crisis" in Carl Schmitt’s thought. In the first part of the paper, I try to show why Carl Schmitt could be considered a "thinker of the crisis", through the analysis of two of his major books:...
| Άλλοι τίτλοι: | Crisis, (Non)Decision? |
|---|---|
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Λιθουανικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla
2013
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Religija ir kultūra
Έτος: 2013, Τόμος: 13, Σελίδες: 84-93 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
galia
B Giorgio Agamben B krizė B Carl Schmitt B sprendimas B Decision B Power B Crisis |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Σύνοψη: | The article deals with the concept of "decision" related with the concept of "crisis" in Carl Schmitt’s thought. In the first part of the paper, I try to show why Carl Schmitt could be considered a "thinker of the crisis", through the analysis of two of his major books: Die Diktatur (1921) and Politische Theologie (1922). In the second part, I show why "crisis" and "decision" are related in Schmitt’s doctrine. In the last part, I try to give a counter-reading of Schmitt’s decisionism through two literary characters: Bartleby the Scrivener and Mullah Nasrr Eddin. In this final part, the article discusses whether Giorgio Agamben’s theory of power can offer an adequate counterbalance for the dominant decisionist approach to the politics. My aim is to show how only an indecisionist approach could refuse the lexicon of the "crisis" in which our society lives. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1822-4539 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Religija ir kultūra
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15388/Relig.2013.13.10101 |