Religinės argumentacijos (ne)galimybė formaliojoje viešojoje erdvėje = The (Im)Possibility of Religious Reasoning in the Formal Public Sphere

[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English]This article focuses on the debate between Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on the place of religious argumentation in the formal public sphere. Habermas’s position, which arises from his critique of John Rawls’s position and is also it...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:The (Im)Possibility of Religious Reasoning in the Formal Public Sphere
Main Author: Kalkauskaitė, Vaida (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Lithuanian
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla 2015
In: Religija ir kultūra
Year: 2015, Volume: 16/17, Pages: 78-88
Further subjects:B Jürgen Habermas
B Charles Taylor
B formal public sphere
B religija
B Religion
B formalioji viešoji erdvė
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1789567343
003 DE-627
005 20220623171636.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220214s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||lit c
024 7 |a 10.15388/Relig.2015.6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1789567343 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1789567343 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a lit 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kalkauskaitė, Vaida  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religinės argumentacijos (ne)galimybė formaliojoje viešojoje erdvėje  |b  = The (Im)Possibility of Religious Reasoning in the Formal Public Sphere 
246 3 1 |a The (Im)Possibility of Religious Reasoning in the Formal Public Sphere 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a [full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English]This article focuses on the debate between Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on the place of religious argumentation in the formal public sphere. Habermas’s position, which arises from his critique of John Rawls’s position and is also its continuation, is based on the principle of common reason. In order to use their arguments in the public sphere, religious people must translate them into secular language, which is supposedly understood by every rational person. Taylor opposes this position by stating that the division between religious and secular arguments is not well enough reasoned. The aim of this article is to find out whether the views of Hebarmas, as well as the core presuppositions that they are based on, can stand their ground and whether they are capable of reflecting the current geopolitical and sociocultural situation and help in understanding it. This is done by using the points made by Taylor and other authors who support his views and trying to find a satisfactory alternative solution. 
601 |a religio 
650 4 |a Charles Taylor 
650 4 |a Jürgen Habermas 
650 4 |a formal public sphere 
650 4 |a formalioji viešoji erdvė 
650 4 |a religija 
650 4 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religija ir kultūra  |d Vilnius : Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla, 2006  |g 16/17(2015), Seite 78-88  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1745798285  |w (DE-600)3051786-2  |x 1822-4539  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16/17  |g year:2015  |g pages:78-88 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.15388/Relig.2015.6  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/religija-ir-kultura/article/view/12310  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 16/17  |j 2015  |h 78-88 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 405655496X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1789567343 
LOK |0 005 20220214174605 
LOK |0 008 220214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STG 0 0 |a Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie