On the Non-enforceability of the Penal Sanctions in the Mosaic Law
Although the “theonomy” debate has largely subsided, it continues to be espoused by a vocal minority because it was never properly addressed. The key issue is not whether the judicial laws are still binding. These laws are grounded in God’s moral character; hence, they are still binding. But since t...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2022
|
Dans: |
Journal of reformed theology
Année: 2022, Volume: 16, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 90-107 |
Classifications IxTheo: | CH Christianisme et société NCA Éthique NCD Éthique et politique |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
civil magistrate
B judicial law B penal sanctions B moral law B Reformed Theology B ceremonial law B Mosaic Law B Theonomy |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Although the “theonomy” debate has largely subsided, it continues to be espoused by a vocal minority because it was never properly addressed. The key issue is not whether the judicial laws are still binding. These laws are grounded in God’s moral character; hence, they are still binding. But since they were enforced by magistrates who worked in conjunction with Levitical priests in the context of a now-defunct priesthood, today’s magistrates would lack the divine guidance and authority to enforce the judicial laws as was once prescribed. A conceptual distinction should therefore be drawn between moral/judicial laws and their legal enforcement in society. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1569-7312 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of reformed theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15697312-bja10026 |