The Dawkins Challenge
Richard Dawkins, in his The God Delusion, argued strongly for atheism. Alister McGrath picked up the challenge and argued that Dawkins is wrong and that his arguments are very weak. This article, part of a symposium honoring McGrath looks in detail at the God Delusion, and at two books by McGrath, D...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Zygon
Έτος: 2022, Τόμος: 57, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 181-199 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
God Delusion
B Richard Dawkins B Alister McGrath |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | Richard Dawkins, in his The God Delusion, argued strongly for atheism. Alister McGrath picked up the challenge and argued that Dawkins is wrong and that his arguments are very weak. This article, part of a symposium honoring McGrath looks in detail at the God Delusion, and at two books by McGrath, Dawkins’ God, written before The God Delusion appeared but addressing the arguments of that book, and The Dawkins’ Delusion, co-authored with his wife Joanna Collicutt McGrath that appeared after The God Delusion. It is argued that the debate is still timely and that sociological factors are extremely important. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Αναφορά: | Kommentar in "Response: Science and Religion—the State of the Art (2022)"
|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12763 |