Path-bound normativity and a Confucian case of historical holism
I bring a new thesis of historical holism to bear on the well-known Mencius-Xunzi dispute about xing/性. The significance of doing so seems bi-directional: in the first direction, i.e. applying the thesis to the dispute, my reconstruction of both Mencius’s and Xunzi’s views aims at revealing a largel...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Carfax
2022
|
В: |
Asian philosophy
Год: 2022, Том: 32, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 215-235 |
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Mengzi 372 до н.э.-289 до н.э.
/ Xunzi ca. 340 до н.э./298 - 245 до н.э./230
/ Дебаты
/ Холизм
/ Нормативность
/ Человечность (мотив)
|
Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии BM Китайский универсизм KBM Азия TB Античность VA Философия |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
path-bound normativity
B Historical holism B Mencius-Xunzi dispute B xing / 性 B retrospective necessity |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | I bring a new thesis of historical holism to bear on the well-known Mencius-Xunzi dispute about xing/性. The significance of doing so seems bi-directional: in the first direction, i.e. applying the thesis to the dispute, my reconstruction of both Mencius’s and Xunzi’s views aims at revealing a largely neglected but important aspect of Confucian thought. While in the second direction, whoever is otherwise convinced by the Mencian insight may find its successful reconstruction as a case of historical holism good evidence for the thesis itself, which seems ground-breaking in certain areas of contemporary analytic philosophy. The paper largely focuses on the first direction, with quite detailed exposition of key analytic elements for understanding historical holism. A notion of retrospective necessity stands out in the exposition, supporting the main idea of path-bound normativity which turns out to be, for our present case, a notion of implicit and endogenous normativity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2961 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Asian philosophy
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2021.1977456 |