PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP IN LATVIA
How did geo-politics and history influence the development of biblical scholarship in Latvia in the last one hundred years (1920-present)? This essay explores the three major periods of Latvia’s recent history - the first period of Latvian independence (1920-1940), the Soviet occupation (1940-1990),...
| Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Univ.
2021
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Scriptura <Stellenbosch>
Έτος: 2021, Τόμος: 120, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 1-29 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Βιβλική ερμηνεία
/ Εξηγητική
/ Lettland
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | HA Βίβλος KAJ Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1914-, Σύγχρονη Εποχή KBK Ανατολική Ευρώπη |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Σύνοψη: | How did geo-politics and history influence the development of biblical scholarship in Latvia in the last one hundred years (1920-present)? This essay explores the three major periods of Latvia’s recent history - the first period of Latvian independence (1920-1940), the Soviet occupation (1940-1990), and the second period of Latvian independence (from 1990 onwards) - and it shows that a constant throughout these three periods is how German scholarship and the historical-critical method have shaped biblical studies in Latvia. The first period of independence was considered the ‘golden age’ of biblical exegesis in contrast with the period of Soviet occupation, when there was a stagnation of biblical scholarship and a disconnect with the progressive scholarly debate in the West, as well as a distorted hermeneutical framework. The revived hope of a robust biblical scholarship in the second period of independence also resurrected the long-standing dispute between the perceived liberal and conservative approaches to biblical studies and theology, and re-established the divide between the Faculty of Theology and other theological institutions. This has weakened the relationship between academic theological education and church life, and limited cooperation and biblical debate between scholars and institutions. Furthermore, long-standing German influence in biblical scholarship has been slowly giving way to a wider international scholarly community. This paper concludes that the future of biblical scholarship in Latvia needs to develop on a national and international level. Scholars and institutions need to learn how to cooperate towards robust biblical research and establish a dialogue with not just the German-speaking world but also the wider international (English-speaking) community. This will bring Latvian scholars to an environment where they can engage with and contribute to the international biblical debate. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2305-445X |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Scriptura |
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.7833/120-1-2054 |