Hearing Voices, Interpreting Words
In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion....
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Review |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Equinox Publ.
2021
|
| In: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Jahr: 2019, Band: 7, Heft: 1, Seiten: 9-20 |
| Rezension von: | Hearing voices and other matters of the mind (New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Gardiner, Mark Q.)
|
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Religiöse Erfahrung
/ Psychische Störung
/ Methodologie
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | AA Religionswissenschaft AE Religionspsychologie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Rezension
B Religion B Cognition B Behavior B Interpretation B Mental Disorder |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion. I argue that that methodology imposes some important constraints on the type of theorizing McCauley and Graham propose, and that their findings in turn suggest some important modifications to that methodology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Bezug: | Kritik in "Gods in Disorder (2021)"
|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.19502 |