Hearing Voices, Interpreting Words
In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion....
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Review |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Equinox Publ.
2021
|
| En: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Año: 2019, Volumen: 7, Número: 1, Páginas: 9-20 |
| Reseña de: | Hearing voices and other matters of the mind (New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Gardiner, Mark Q.)
|
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Experiencia religiosa
/ Disturbio mental
/ Metodología
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AA Ciencias de la religión AE Psicología de la religión |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Religión
B Reseña B Interpretación B Cognition B Behavior B Mental Disorder |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion. I argue that that methodology imposes some important constraints on the type of theorizing McCauley and Graham propose, and that their findings in turn suggest some important modifications to that methodology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Gods in Disorder (2021)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.19502 |