Hearing Voices, Interpreting Words
In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion....
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Review |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Equinox Publ.
2021
|
| Em: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Ano: 2019, Volume: 7, Número: 1, Páginas: 9-20 |
| Resenha de: | Hearing voices and other matters of the mind (New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Gardiner, Mark Q.)
|
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Experiência religiosa
/ Distúrbio mental
/ Metodologia
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AA Ciências da religião AE Psicologia da religião |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Interpretação
B Religião B Cognition B Behavior B Mental Disorder B Resenha |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion. I argue that that methodology imposes some important constraints on the type of theorizing McCauley and Graham propose, and that their findings in turn suggest some important modifications to that methodology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Gods in Disorder (2021)"
|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.19502 |