Gods in Disorder
Commentators’ concerns occasion clarifications of positions in Hearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind. Philosophical naturalism holds that philosophers needlessly handicap their projects if they ignore the sciences. Ecumenical Naturalism maintains that similar forms of cognition and experience...
| Главные авторы: | ; |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Equinox Publ.
2021
|
| В: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Год: 2019, Том: 7, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 94-111 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Религиозный опыт
/ Психическое нарушение (мотив)
/ Познание
/ Естественность
/ Натурализм (философия) (Философия (мотив))
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AE Психология религии AG Религиозная жизнь |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
explanatory pluralism
B By-Product Theory B Ecumenical Naturalism B cognitive science of religion B hearing voices B maturationally natural cognition B Meaning Making |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Commentators’ concerns occasion clarifications of positions in Hearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind. Philosophical naturalism holds that philosophers needlessly handicap their projects if they ignore the sciences. Ecumenical Naturalism maintains that similar forms of cognition and experience associated with religiosity and mental disorders may submit to similar scientific explanations. The by-product theory, which looks to the operations of maturationally natural cognitive capacities to explain religious representations’ forms, offers explanatory leverage with regard to some mental disorders. The fact that examples are mostly American, Christian, and Western need not preclude the accounts’ broader applicability. Explanatory pluralism endorses many explanatory approaches. The aim is only to show how much cognitive considerations can do, not to suggest that they provide comprehensive theories of anything. Other telling proposals will enhance understanding of these matters. The operations of maturationally natural dispositions, regardless of how they are cued, contribute to what humans take to be meaningful. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Introduction to Hearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind (2021)"
Kritik von "Hearing Voices, Interpreting Words (2021)" Kritik von "Naturalism, Religion, and Mental Disorders (2021)" Kritik von "Religious Experiences Are Interpreted through Priors from Cultural Frameworks Supported by Imaginative Capacity Rather Than Special Cognition (2021)" Kritik von "The Processes of Believing, Mental Abnormalities, and Other Matters of the Mind: Where Do They Come From? What Are They Good For? (2021)" Kritik von "By-Products or By Design? Considering Hearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind (2021)" Kritik von "Hearing Voices, Epilepsy, and Religious Experience: McCauley and Graham’s New Solutions to Old Problems (2021)" |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.20513 |